Skip to content

Streaming Spend: A Complicated Calculation

Streaming Spend: A Complicated Calculation

Share This Post

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on email

Streaming Spend: A Complicated Calculation

The world of streaming is fragmented and complicated. It’s hard to keep track of all the providers and ways of accessing OTT.  It turns out it is also hard for consumers to keep track of their streaming subscription costs. We found that most consumers are underestimating their monthly expenditure on subscription services by 35%.

We asked 1,000 consumers to estimate the amount they spent on streaming services each month, then calculated their actual costs based on the services they then reported paying for. The average estimated spend was about $49, while the average calculated expenditure each month was $66.

Everyone’s Undercounting

For both estimated and calculated payments, the average spend was about $15 higher than the median spend. This indicates that some people pay a lot for streaming services, pushing up the average. Slicing into the data, we can see that two groups in particular pushed up the averages — those with high wealth and parents. Both groups tended to far underestimate their spend, with high-wealth groups spending an estimated $60 monthly and parents $56. For both groups, calculated spends were over $85 per month.

While parents and wealthier consumers are paying a lot more than they think, on average, all groups of consumers are miscalculating their monthly expenditure on streaming services.  There is one exception, though — seniors are the one group spending less than they think they are, with a monthly bill $14 less than their estimated spend of $48. Why would seniors think their streaming content costs more than it does? They also tend to have a cable subscription.  The premium price of a cable bundle and use of smart TV remotes may cause seniors to lump all services into one number in their heads.

Apple TV Plus had the smallest reach of any subscription-only streaming service, with just 11% of our respondents paying for it. Like many Apple products, we also saw a coastal geographic skew of Apple TV Plus, especially New England and California. HBO Max followed this same geographic pattern, but had almost three times as much reach as Apple TV Plus.

Parents are strong SVOD users, but are more or less willing to watch ads depending on how old their children are. Households with kids under 8 were the most likely to watch SVODs. Households with older children were slightly more likely to watch ad-supported content types.

Parents Avoid Ads

Like avoiding a street when the ice cream man arrives, we know parents might be sensitive to exposing small children to ads. However, teenagers may be a factor in adoption of newer free media sources, driving penetration numbers up in those households.

For some groups of viewers, we can see there is low price sensitivity to streaming subscriptions.  For parents, the value of ad-free content seems established, and we can expect services to move from new additions to necessities. Seniors may be anchored by the premium price sticker on cable and be less sensitive to bundled services. As marketers, we know consumers will always pay for choice if they can afford it, as we’ve seen with higher wealth households seeing the value in access to all streaming content.

For other groups of viewers, we can expect that the piling on of services will add up to some serious price shock and increased interest in cheaper ad-supported alternatives. Younger, single-person and lower income households will take the time to hunt for deals and alternatives.

The price anchor is untethered for both price-sensitive and more tolerant streaming viewers. As the industry figures out consumers’ tolerance for subscription fees, it’s important to consider that most consumers haven’t yet decided on their price tolerance, either.


View original article published in NextTV’s Broadcasting + Cable

More To Explore